Chess is a conflict, not between 2 intelligences, but between 2 wills.
() vs. ()
-
Friday, August 13, 2010
Chess is above all, a fight
As Emanuel Lasker said. He said that too :
Chess is a conflict, not between 2 intelligences, but between 2 wills.
() vs. ()
-
Chess is a conflict, not between 2 intelligences, but between 2 wills.
() vs. ()
-
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About a matter of will :
ReplyDelete- in the previous New in Chess there is an article about Bent Larsen and the title is : the will to win!
- Romain Edouard is a very good example. In the next day he lost an exchange against Hamdouchi but smashed him in the zeitnot.
- The tenacity of Nakamura defending his losing rook ending against Van Wely yesterday, and drawing it, is worthwhile too.
- Carlsen's attitude in a lot of games may be the best modern example.
- If you look at the past, of course Fischer and Kasparov :-)